Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: One good thing about Shapiro!

  1. #1
    Inactive Member Bye!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    December 16th, 2001
    Posts
    256
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I have been bashing him about the moves he's made so far, but one comment he made, gives me a little hope.

    He said he doesn't want to trade his everyday players for average pitchers. He would rather develop pitchers than give away players. He mentioned the Casey for Burba and the Giles for Rincon trades.

    While I'm not pleased with the Alomar trade or the Guttierez signing, at least we know he realizes the above trades (Casey and Giles) were mistakes. That's something that Hart has never admitted to.

    It remains to be seen if the Alomar deal will help in the future, but at least it wasn't for another warmed over pitcher that Hart seems to be infatuated with. He's already going that route in Texas.

    I still believe that if Shapiro had hung tough with the Mets, he wouldn't have had to give up Bascik or Peoples, and probably could have forced them to take Cordero, or instead of Snyder, gotten their top prospect. Had he done that, I would have felt a lot better about this deal.

    ------------------

  2. #2
    Inactive Member The Genius's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 9th, 2001
    Posts
    485
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Bye!:

    I still believe that if Shapiro had hung tough with the Mets, he wouldn't have had to give up Bascik or Peoples, and probably could have forced them to take Cordero, or instead of Snyder, gotten their top prospect. Had he done that, I would have felt a lot better about this deal.
    <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    As we used to say back in Ohio,
    "It's last year's snow."


  3. #3
    Inactive Member Swanny's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 10th, 2001
    Posts
    292
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    The Giles for Rincon trade was insane but I actually understood the Casey for Burba trade.(At the time anyway)

    ------------------

  4. #4
    Inactive Member The Crank's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 15th, 2001
    Posts
    464
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Question

    Why are some people so hung up on Shapiro giving up Bascik and Peoples? Bascik = Rigdon and Peoples = Scott Morgan.

    ------------------

  5. #5
    Inactive Member Swanny's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 10th, 2001
    Posts
    292
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I don't think it's the end of the world that we lost those 2 guys but I don't think we needed to include any additional players besides Alomar for what we got in return. When hall of famers are traded it's usually not necessary to include anymore players. I guess that's just "the rookie" in Shapiro.

    ------------------

  6. #6
    Inactive Member srg's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 20th, 2001
    Posts
    265
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Thumbs up

    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Swanny:
    I don't think it's the end of the world that we lost those 2 guys but I don't think we needed to include any additional players besides Alomar for what we got in return. When hall of famers are traded it's usually not necessary to include anymore players. I guess that's just "the rookie" in Shapiro.

    <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>The rookie in Shapiro? What does that mean? If you knew what you were talking about you would understand that Peoples and Bacsik both would have been taken off the 40 man roster but Shapiro found takers for both stiffs. What does Hall of Famers have to do with either of these career minor leaguers being shipped in this deal? That makes no sense.



    ------------------

  7. #7
    Inactive Member Wilhelm's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 17th, 2001
    Posts
    110
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Wink

    When Escobar and Lawton go into the HOF together in 2025 they'll Mark Shapiro for the opportunity to win those record breaking 7 WS titles in a row. Then we'll know what kind of deal that was.

    Casey for Burba: Even trade. For pete's sake we needed those 15+ win/ 200 IP seasons more than a singles hitter.

    ------------------

  8. #8
    Inactive Member Bye!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    December 16th, 2001
    Posts
    256
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Bascik would have been kept on the 40 man roster. He was their minor league pitcher of the year this year.

    I realize it wasn't a huge loss losing Peoples and Bascik, but if we still had them, they could have been packaged in another deal.

    Yes Burba helped this team, but we didn't win the WS so how much did he help? For a stud like Casey we should have been able to get a younger pitcher. What none of you seem to get is that Burba's 15 victories a year, were largely a product of this team's offense.

    All I'm really saying is, Shapiro didn't get as much as he could have for Alomar. Escobar is a huge gamble. Traber looks to be eventually (3 years?) a number 4 type pitcher. Lawton is a good (not great) player who has to prove he can play on grass as well as he did on carpet. Snyder isn't much more of a prospect than Peoples. He's a year or 2 younger with similar stats.

    We gave up a future HOF player, who arguably may go down as the best all time 2B man in baseball. For what we got, that was all we should have given up.

    ------------------

  9. #9
    Inactive Member Hawaii007's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 11th, 2001
    Posts
    596
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I really don't understand why anyone has a problem with the Casey-Burba trade. Burba won 15+ games the first two years he was here and was quite effective. He didn't have it this year, but we got two very good years out of a pitcher for a player where we did not have a spot for.


    ------------------

  10. #10
    Inactive Member srg's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 20th, 2001
    Posts
    265
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Again, Mike Bacsik was going to be taken off the 40 man roster if the Alomar trade had not occured, he is not a prospect. That pitcher of the year award was meaningless and had nuthing to do with prospect status. Last year Jason Stanford won that award over CC Sabathia.Others who won that award are such notables as John Carter-Robert Pugmire-Mark Deschenes, Mike Soper.


    Billy Taber is considered a front of the rotation pitcher.

    I am still wondering what that better package was for Alomar. The Yankees would not have given Soriano straight up for Alomar.

    ------------------


    [This message has been edited by srg (edited January 03, 2002).]

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •